Help ?

IGMIN: あなたがここにいてくれて嬉しいです. お願いクリック '新しいクエリを作成してください' 当ウェブサイトへの初めてのご訪問で、さらに情報が必要な場合は.

すでに私たちのネットワークのメンバーで、すでに提出した質問に関する進展を追跡する必要がある場合は, クリック '私のクエリに連れて行ってください.'

Search

Organised by  IgMin Fevicon

Regional sites

Browse by Subjects

Welcome to IgMin Research – an Open Access journal uniting Biology, Medicine, and Engineering. We’re dedicated to advancing global knowledge and fostering collaboration across scientific fields.

Browse by Sections

At IgMin Research, we bridge the frontiers of Biology, Medicine, and Engineering to foster interdisciplinary innovation. Our expanded scope now embraces a wide spectrum of scientific disciplines, empowering global researchers to explore, contribute, and collaborate through open access.

Special Issues

Our purpose is to unite scientific minds for collaborative efforts that yield quick knowledge expansion.

Members

Our purpose is to unite scientific minds for collaborative efforts that yield quick knowledge expansion.

Articles

Our purpose is to unite scientific minds for collaborative efforts that yield quick knowledge expansion.

Explore Content

Our purpose is to unite scientific minds for collaborative efforts that yield quick knowledge expansion.

Identify Us

Our purpose is to unite scientific minds for collaborative efforts that yield quick knowledge expansion.

IgMin Corporation

Welcome to IgMin, a leading platform dedicated to enhancing knowledge dissemination and professional growth across multiple fields of science, technology, and the humanities. We believe in the power of open access, collaboration, and innovation. Our goal is to provide individuals and organizations with the tools they need to succeed in the global knowledge economy.

Publications Support
[email protected]
E-Books Support
[email protected]
Webinars & Conferences Support
[email protected]
Content Writing Support
[email protected]
IT Support
[email protected]

Search

Select Language

Explore Section

Content for the explore section slider goes here.

Abstract

要約 at IgMin Research

Our purpose is to unite scientific minds for collaborative efforts that yield quick knowledge expansion.

Engineering Group Perspective 記事ID: igmin354

AI is Sustainable. Scientific Knowledge Isn't? Reconsidering Human Intellect in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence DOI10.61927/igmin354 Affiliation

Affiliation

    Department of ICT School, College of Sciences & Engineering, University of Tasmania, Australia

90
VIEWS
25
DOWNLOADS
Connect with Us

要約

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming scientific research by accelerating literature retrieval, enhancing evidence synthesis, generating hypotheses, and supporting scholarly communication. Unlike earlier technological innovations that primarily extended human capabilities, AI increasingly performs cognitive tasks traditionally associated with scientific reasoning and knowledge creation. While these advances improve research efficiency and interdisciplinary discovery, they also raise important questions about the long-term sustainability of scientific knowledge. This perspective explores how the growing integration of AI into scientific workflows may reshape the way knowledge is created, interpreted, and validated. It introduces the concept of recursive epistemic drift, describing the gradual movement of scientific understanding away from direct empirical observation toward successive layers of AI-mediated interpretation. Although AI can identify patterns and synthesize vast amounts of information, it cannot replace the uniquely human capacities for critical inquiry, contextual judgment, conceptual imagination, and reflective skepticism that underpin scientific progress. These epistemic capabilities remain essential for questioning assumptions, recognizing anomalies, and ensuring that scientific knowledge remains self-correcting and continually renewed. From a knowledge management perspective, the paper argues that the future sustainability of scientific knowledge depends not only on advances in AI but also on preserving the human intellectual capabilities that continually reconnect scientific understanding with empirical reality.

参考文献

    1. Popper KR. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge; 1959.
    2. Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 4th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2012.
    3. Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1966.
    4. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
    5. Davenport TH, Prusak L. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1998.
    6. Russell S, Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 4th ed. Pearson; 2021.
    7. Floridi L. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities. Oxford University Press; 2023.
    8. Kitano H. Nobel Turing Challenge: Creating the engine for scientific discovery. NPJ Systems Biology and Applications. 2021;7:29.
    9. Gil Y, Greaves M, Hendler J, Hirsh H. Amplify scientific discovery with artificial intelligence. Science. 2014;346(6206):171-172.
    10. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596:583-589.
    11. Stokes JM, Yang K, Swanson K, et al. A deep learning approach to antibiotic discovery. Cell. 2020;180(4):688-702.e13.
    12. Bommasani R, Hudson DA, Adeli E, et al. On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models. Stanford Center for Research on Foundation Models; 2021.
    13. GPT-4 Technical Report. 2023.
    14. Artificial Intelligence in Science: Challenges, Opportunities and the Future of Research. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2023.
    15. Forbus KD. The importance of knowledge bases for artificial intelligence in science. In: Artificial Intelligence in Science. OECD Publishing; 2023.
    16. Fierro C, Dhar R, Stamatiou F, Garneau N, Søgaard A. Defining Knowledge: Bridging Epistemology and Large Language Models. In: Proceedings of EMNLP 2024; 2024:16096-16111.
    17. Kim M, Thorne J. Epistemology of Language Models: Do Language Models Have Holistic Knowledge? 2024.
    18. Zhang Q, Ding K, Lyv T, et al. Scientific Large Language Models: A Survey on Biological and Chemical Domains. 2024.
    19. Collins H, Thorne S. Large language models and scientific discourse: Where's the intelligence? Synthese. 2026;207:160.
    20. Simon HA. The Sciences of the Artificial. 3rd ed. MIT Press; 1996.
    21. Latour B, Woolgar S. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press; 1986.
    22. Merton RK. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University of Chicago Press; 1973.
    23. Chalmers AF. What Is This Thing Called Science? 4th ed. Hackett Publishing; 2013.
    24. Searle JR. Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1980;3(3):417-457.
    25. Bender EM, Gebru T, McMillan-Major A, Shmitchell S. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of FAccT. 2021:610-623.
    26. Dwivedi YK, Hughes L, Baabdullah AM, et al. So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative AI. International Journal of Information Management. 2023;71:102642.
    27. Nature Editorial. Artificial intelligence can accelerate science if researchers use it responsibly. Nature. 2023;621:451-452.
    28. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Paris: UNESCO; 2021.
    29. World Economic Forum. The Future of AI for Science. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2024.
    30. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2017.

類似の記事

The Influence of Low Pesticide Doses on Fusarium Molds
Mihaela Ursan, Oana-Alina Boiu-Sicuia, Ioana Irina Crăinescu and Călina Petruța Cornea
DOI10.61927/igmin226
EB Naevi-like Lesion in Infant Bullous Pemphigoid
Laura Serpa, Haizza Monteiro, Maria de Oliveira Buffara, Raíssa Rodriguez, Ana Luisa Alves, Viviane Maria Maiolini and Elisa Fontenelle
DOI10.61927/igmin201

Why publish with us?

  • Global Visibility – Indexed in major databases

  • Fast Peer Review – Decision within 14–21 days

  • Open Access – Maximize readership and citation

  • Multidisciplinary Scope – Biology, Medicine and Engineering

  • Editorial Board Excellence – Global experts involved

  • University Library Indexing – Via OCLC

  • Permanent Archiving – CrossRef DOI

  • APC – Affordable APCs with discounts

  • Citation – High Citation Potential

Submit Your Article

Advertisement